← Recent Projects
Case Study

From Emergency Tarping to a Class 4 Partial Roof Replacement Near Carr, Colorado

Carr, CO
Roof ReplacementStorm Damage RoofingArchitectural ShinglesClass IV Impact-Resistant ShinglesTAMKO

High winds can turn a roofing problem into an immediate exposure risk.

At this rural single-family home near Carr in northern Weld County, winter winds damaged a substantial portion of the asphalt shingle roof. Project photographs show missing and displaced shingles, exposed roof decking, lifted material, and temporary patching across the affected area.

American Roofing and Restorations first stabilized the roof in March to reduce the risk of additional water intrusion during upcoming spring weather. The team then helped the homeowner document and file an insurance claim before completing the approved partial roof replacement with TAMKO StormFighter FLEX® Class 4 shingles.

Project Overview

Project DetailInformation
General locationCarr area, northern Weld County, Colorado
Property typeResidential single-family home
Primary problemWinter wind damage to asphalt shingles
Initial responseTemporary roof protection installed in March 2026
Insurance involvementAmerican Roofing and Restorations assisted the homeowner with filing and documentation
Approved project scopeRepair and replacement of approximately one half of the roof
Roofing materialTAMKO StormFighter FLEX®
Impact classificationUL 2218 Class 4
Project completion dateJune 26, 2026

The Problem: Significant Wind Damage on an Exposed Rural Property

The photographs show a home surrounded by open agricultural land with limited nearby shelter from the wind.

A broad section of the roof had lost shingles, leaving portions of the wood roof deck exposed. Other shingles were visibly lifted, folded, displaced, or temporarily secured. Several photographs also show improvised or short-term protection over vulnerable areas.

This was more than a cosmetic issue. Once shingles are removed or lifted, the layers beneath them become more vulnerable to precipitation and continued wind exposure.

The project form identifies winter wind as the cause of the roof damage. It does not identify one precise storm date, and the photographs alone cannot establish which individual wind event caused each affected area.

Regional Wind Conditions Near Carr

The homeowner’s description of a particularly windy winter is consistent with documented regional conditions.

On December 17, 2025, the National Weather Service recorded an 82 mph gust approximately seven miles southwest of Carr. Other reports from the same event included 68 mph near the Colorado–Wyoming border, 64 mph at Nunn, and 71 mph at Briggsdale. These observations confirm that northern Weld County and the surrounding Carr area experienced severe wind during the winter, although they do not prove that this specific event caused the damage at the property.

Wind remained an important regional factor in March. The Colorado Climate Center’s Fort Collins station, used here as regional context rather than a measurement from the home, recorded a peak gust of 51.6 mph on March 12 and ten days with gusts above 20 mph. June 2026 also included 15 days with gusts above 20 mph at that station.

This combination of an open rural setting and repeated seasonal wind helps explain why prompt temporary protection was an important first step.

Stabilizing the Roof Before Spring Storms

American Roofing and Restorations visited the property in March and installed temporary protection over the damaged section.

The purpose was not to present the tarp or patch as a permanent repair. It was to reduce the risk of additional exposure while the homeowner worked through the inspection, documentation, insurance, and project-planning process.

That distinction matters. Temporary protection can help limit further damage, but it does not restore the complete function of missing shingles, underlayment, flashing, and other roofing components.

The March photographs created a visual record of the condition at the time of the initial response. They show the extent of the missing material, displaced shingles, exposed decking, and areas requiring short-term stabilization.

Helping the Homeowner Navigate the Insurance Process

After the roof was stabilized, American Roofing and Restorations helped the homeowner file an insurance claim and provide documentation of the damage.

According to the completed project form, the insurance carrier’s approved scope covered approximately one half of the roof rather than a full replacement.

American Roofing and Restorations did not represent the project as a complete reroof. The team worked within the defined scope and repaired or replaced the approved half of the roofing system.

This was an important part of providing an honest recommendation. The homeowner needed a clear understanding of what the carrier had approved, which roof area would be replaced, and which portion would remain in service.

Why a Partial Roof Replacement Requires Careful Planning

Replacing only one half of a roof presents different considerations from installing an entirely new system.

The new roofing must be integrated with the portion that remains. Existing vents, plumbing pipes, flashing points, ridge details, and surrounding materials must also be accounted for during installation.

The project photographs document work around several visible roof penetrations. Images taken during the process show exposed underlayment and flashing components around plumbing pipes, while later photographs show those areas incorporated into the finished shingle field.

Because the approved scope did not include the entire roof, the objective was not to suggest that every existing roofing component had been replaced. The objective was to restore the damaged half professionally while coordinating it with the retained section.

Selecting TAMKO StormFighter FLEX® Class 4 Shingles

American Roofing and Restorations installed TAMKO StormFighter FLEX® shingles on the approved portion of the roof.

TAMKO describes StormFighter FLEX as a polymer-modified architectural shingle engineered with additional flexibility and reinforcement. The product is classified under UL 2218 as Class 4 for impact resistance.

Class 4 is the highest classification within the UL 2218 impact test, but it does not mean that a roof is hail-proof or incapable of future damage. TAMKO also notes that the laboratory test uses dropped steel balls and may not directly reproduce the effects of real storm-driven hail.

This distinction is especially important in Northern Colorado. A higher impact classification can be a valuable part of a roofing decision, but material ratings should always be explained accurately rather than presented as guarantees.

Although the original loss was associated with wind, the Class 4 designation relates specifically to impact testing. Wind performance depends on the complete roofing assembly, attachment method, starter materials, ridge components, installation requirements, and applicable warranty conditions.

The Result

This project progressed through three clearly defined stages:

First, the wind-damaged roof was stabilized to reduce the risk of further exposure.

Second, American Roofing and Restorations helped the homeowner document the condition and move through the insurance claim process.

Finally, the approved half of the roof was repaired or replaced with TAMKO StormFighter FLEX® Class 4 shingles.

The result was not presented as a full-roof replacement because that was not the authorized scope. Instead, the homeowner received a targeted solution that addressed the approved damaged area, restored protection over the exposed section, and introduced an impact-rated shingle to that portion of the home.

For the homeowner, the value of the project was not limited to the finished shingles. It also included timely temporary protection, clear documentation, assistance understanding the insurance scope, and professional completion of a project involving both new and retained roofing areas.

An Education-First Approach to Wind Damage

Wind-damaged roofs do not always lead to the same solution.

Some homes need isolated shingle repairs. Others require replacement of one slope, one half, or the entire roof. The correct recommendation depends on the extent of the damage, the condition of the remaining material, the ability to integrate new and existing components, code requirements, and—when insurance is involved—the carrier’s approved scope.

American Roofing and Restorations helps homeowners understand those differences before work begins.

The goal is not to pressure a homeowner toward the largest possible project. It is to document the roof honestly, explain the available options, provide temporary protection when needed, and complete the agreed scope professionally.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why was only half of the roof replaced?

The completed project form states that the insurance carrier approved replacement of approximately one half of the roof. American Roofing and Restorations completed the work within that approved scope rather than presenting the project as a full replacement.

Is emergency tarping a permanent roof repair?

No. Temporary tarping or patching is intended to reduce exposure while inspection, claim review, material selection, and permanent work are completed. It does not replace a properly installed roofing system.

What does a Class 4 shingle rating mean?

Class 4 is the highest impact classification under the UL 2218 laboratory test. It indicates that the shingle met a defined impact-testing standard, but it does not guarantee that the roof cannot be damaged by hail, wind, falling objects, or other weather conditions.

Does a Class 4 rating refer to wind resistance?

No. Class 4 refers to impact testing. Wind performance is evaluated separately and depends on the product, complete roof assembly, attachment, installation method, and manufacturer requirements.

Can one half of a roof be replaced while the other half remains?

In some situations, yes. The condition of the retained roof, location of the damage, roof design, material availability, code requirements, and transition details must all be evaluated before determining whether a partial replacement is appropriate.